ALL BLOG CONTENT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ANY REFERENCE TO OR MENTION OF INDIVIDUAL STOCKS, INDEXES, OR OTHER SECURITIES ARE NOT RECOMMENDATIONS AND ARE SPECIFICALLY NOT REFERENCED AS PAST RECOMMENDATIONS OF PATTON WEALTH ADVISORS. ALL GRAPHS, CHARTS, AND TABLES ARE PROVIDED FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION ARE ALSO NOT RECOMMENDATIONS AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE IN REACTION TO SHIFTING MARKET, ECONOMIC, OR POLITICAL CONDITIONS. IT IS COMMON FOR US TO USE A FUND AS A PROXY FOR AN INDEX OR ASSET CLASS. FOR MORE DETAILS SEE OUR FULL DISCLOSURE HERE.
Market Commentary for the week ending September 12th, 2020
- U.S. stocks were broadly lower with technology stocks among the worst performers.
- International stocks performed much better than U.S. with several markets around the world actually moving higher.
- Improvements in the employment market stalled with initial claims rising for the week.
A Look Back at 1999
It is said that history never repeats itself but it sure seems to rhyme. I’m not sure who said this but it does seem to be applicable to market behavior in that nothing tends to happen exactly the same as the past but there certainly tend to be some similarities. I have no idea whether comparing today’s environment to the tech-bubble of 1999 is applicable but many are doing it and I have done some of the same.
The 2020 market through early September, not to suggest it is over, was fueled by a handful of leading technology stocks. This fact is certainly similar to the late ‘90s tech bubble.
The accompanying table shows TODAY’s 10 largest technology stocks, their performance during the past decade, year-to-date, and so far this month of September. As you can see, the average of these 10 stocks has gained nearly 1,700% during the last 10 years (Alphabet and Facebook have not been public for the full 10 years) while the S&P 500 is up 270%. The year-to-date comparison is similar with these stocks up +36% compared the S&P 500’s gain of +5%. The market decline this month has been one where these 10 top tech stocks have fallen -8.3% or nearly double the S&P 500’s loss.
* 10-year % Change is from its IPO price (shorter than 10 years)
The following table shows the top 10 tech stocks at the end of 1999. These stock were very much the darlings of Wall Street having produced outsized market gains leading up to the end of 1999 and appeared unstoppable. That was not the case though as all of these stocks suffered massive losses during the next few years falling an average of -80% from the market’s peak in March 2000 to the low in 2002. Furthermore, only two of these 10 stocks recovered and produced gains while many others didn’t survive.
* 10-year % Change is from its IPO price (shorter than 10 years)
Source: www.YCharts.com, Standard & Poor’s, CRSP, Patton analysis
Again, I’m unsure if today’s market environment should be considered to the late ‘90s but I do believe investors need to be aware that stocks do not go higher forever. Furthermore, even though they are great companies, their stocks prices can get far ahead of reality and suffer mightily even if the company itself continues to thrive.
This Week’s Performance Highlights
U.S. stocks were broadly and meaningfully lower for the week as the shares of leading technology companies and other strong performers in 2020 faced rather aggressive selling pressure.
- Large U.S. stocks were -2.5% as measured by the S&P 500 during the holiday shortened week. This is the second consecutive weekly decline leaving the index down -4.4% for September but still higher year-to-date by +4.9%. The tech-heavy NASDAQ Composite faced a bigger loss down -4.1% for the week while the Dow Industrials weather the best with a drop of just -1.7%.
The accompanying graph shows the NASDAQ’s performance for the month with the vertical bar representing the range of trading for the day and the tick mark being the close. As it shows, there was a sharp drop late in the first week of September followed by a failed recovery early in the most recent week but then falling to new recent lows and off -10% from its high.
- Among the 11 economic sectors tracked by Standard & Poor’s, energy stocks were the worst performers with the sector falling -6.5%. The worst performers were Occidental Petroleum (OXY), Apache (APA), and Diamondback Energy (FANG) all off -17% or more. The basic materials sector was the only one higher up +1.0% for the week.
- Small U.S. stocks performed suffered along with large stocks dropping -3.0% now down -9.3% for the year.
- International stocks held up far better than U.S. stocks with developed country stocks actually rising +0.6% for the week. Both Eurozone and Japanese stocks climbed, up +0.6% and +1.4% respectively, while stocks in Australia fell -2.0%.
- Emerging markets were lower by only by -0.9% helped by some smaller markets such as South Africa, Mexico, South Korea, and Turkey all posting gains while the biggest of the emerging markets, China, fell -2.1%.
- Commodity prices fell on a sharp decline in the price of oil as demand eases. Oil closed at $37.39 per barrel down $2.38 from the week before leaving the overall commodity index down -2.4%. Real estate stocks declined by -2.9% while gold was one of the very few bright spot for investors gaining +0.4% and holding true to its status as a safe-haven during market turbulence.
- Bond prices inched higher as they often due when stocks are falling with prices gaining +0.2% for the week. The yield on the benchmark 10-Year U.S. Treasury fell to 0.671% from 0.721% the week before. This week was another reminder for investors that not all bonds are the same as U.S. Treasuries gained +0.4% while High Yield Bonds were flat.
Initial jobless claims disappointed this week with 884,000 new claims. Economists had forecast a drop to 840,000 but instead we saw the fourth consecutive week of deterioration. This is dimming hopes that the employment market will continue to recover at a steady pace as had been widely expected.
Continuing jobless claims, the total number of people receiving benefits, rose by more than 93,000 to 13.4 million. Although when including federal programs providing special pandemic relief, claims rose by 380,000 to 29.6 million. As the accompanying graph shows, although claims at the state level are off the pandemic high of 25 million, there are still more than 7 times the number of people receiving benefits today as compared to early in the year.
Consumer prices climbed by +0.4% in the most recent month while producer prices where higher by +0.3% according to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Producer Price Index (PPI). Both numbers were 0.1% higher than economists had expected but were lower than the month before.
On the consumer side, the price of used cars jumped by +5.4% making it the biggest increase in more than a half century. The gain in producer prices were led by price gain for machinery, equipment, parts, and supplies. Increasing prices are expected to moderate with the outlook for inflation remaining low.
Upcoming Economic Reports
- Retail Sales
- Industrial Production
- Jobless Claims
- Consumer Sentiment Index
The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. Any specific securities or investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own situation before making any investment decision including whether to retain an investment adviser.
All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market, economic or political conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. This content was created as of the specific date indicated and reflects the author’s views as of that date. Supporting documentation for any claims or statistical information is available upon request.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Any comments about the performance of securities, markets, or indexes and any opinions presented are not to be viewed as indicators of future performance.
Investing involves risk including loss of principal.
Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses, and cannot be invested in directly. For more information on specific indexes please see full disclosure here.
Any charts, tables, forecasts, etc. contained herein are for illustrative purposes only, may be based upon proprietary research, and are developed through analysis of historical public data.
All corporate names shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are NOT recommendations.
International investments involve additional risks, which include differences in financial accounting standards, currency fluctuations, geopolitical risk, foreign taxes and regulations, and the potential for illiquid markets. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.
Fixed income securities are subject to increased loss of principal during periods of rising interest rates. Fixed-income investments are subject to various other risks including changes in credit quality, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, corporate events, tax ramifications and other factors. Lower-rated securities are subject to greater credit risk, default risk, and liquidity risk.