ALL BLOG CONTENT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ANY REFERENCE TO OR MENTION OF INDIVIDUAL STOCKS, INDEXES, OR OTHER SECURITIES ARE NOT RECOMMENDATIONS AND ARE SPECIFICALLY NOT REFERENCED AS PAST RECOMMENDATIONS OF PATTON WEALTH ADVISORS. ALL GRAPHS, CHARTS, AND TABLES ARE PROVIDED FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION ARE ALSO NOT RECOMMENDATIONS AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE IN REACTION TO SHIFTING MARKET, ECONOMIC, OR POLITICAL CONDITIONS. IT IS COMMON FOR US TO USE A FUND AS A PROXY FOR AN INDEX OR ASSET CLASS. FOR MORE DETAILS SEE OUR FULL DISCLOSURE HERE.
Market Commentary for the week ending June 27th, 2020
- U.S. stocks fell as many states reported record COVID-19 cases while emerging markets were fractionally higher.
- Economic data shows signs of a recovery but at a slower pace than hoped.
- Gold and bonds were higher as investors flocked to safe-havens.
Banks: This Week's Stress Test and More
Banks are an integral component of our economy and financial system making their health a concern to Wall Street and Main Street alike. Following the Financial Crisis more than a decade ago, the Federal Reserve now subjects banks to periodic stress test, or what-if scenarios, to see how banks would be expected to perform under a variety of adverse conditions.
This week the Fed released its findings of its most recent stress test designed to specifically study the effects of a possible prolonged economic downturn due to the coronavirus pandemic. In their worst-case scenario, assuming unemployment peaks at -15.6% and GDP declines by -13.8% peak to trough, the 33 largest banks could have loan losses of $700 billion. In an effort to keep banks healthy, the Fed has now capped dividends payable to shareholders and ordered them to suspend share buybacks.
As of the end of the first quarter 2020, 26 of the 33 banks in the stress test (data is not readily available for the other 7) had loan loss provisions totaling $156 billion. Banks have reacted to the pandemic’s risk as this total loss reserve is up an average of 77% from the prior quarter. Regardless, if the Fed’s worst-case scenario occurs, banks will incur more than $500 billion of additional losses.
This Crisis Compared to the 2008 Financial Crisis
Banks clearly entered our current crisis in far better financial condition than they were in prior to the 2008 financial crisis. A key metric for banks is their loans to deposits ratio. The fewer loans that banks have outstanding relative to their deposits, the lower the risk to the bank. As the accompanying graph shows, the average loan to deposit ratio for the 4 largest banks (J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo) has been trending lower for the past decade.
From an investor’s perspective, banks were among the worst performing sectors during the financial crisis more than a decade ago, as illustrated in the below graph in blue, with the average bank stock falling more than -80%. They recovered from those 2009 lows but never reached all-time highs and are now off more than -36% in 2020.
Although the economy has a meaningful impact on banks’ success, I’ve included the Fed Funds Rate, the target interest rates set by the Federal Reserve, on the below graph in orange. You can see this seems to have a direct impact on the performance of bank stocks as banks tend to be more profitable in higher interest rate environments and less profitable when rates are low as they are now and are expected to be for some time.
This Week's Performance Highlights
Investors’ fears of a second wave of COVID-19 in the U.S. as many states allow the economy to reopen drove stock prices lower with two of the five days experiencing relatively steep declines. Economic data generally showing improvements but not as much as had been hoped for by economists furthered fears that the recovery may take quite some time. These fears lead investors to the safe havens of gold and bonds as those assets were the only ones higher for the week.
- The S&P 500, the broadest measure of large U.S. stocks, fell -2.8% for the week while the Dow Jones Industrials dipped -3.3%. Year-to-date the S&P is off -5.8% and the Dow is lower by -12.3%.
- The tech-heavy NASDAQ held up better down -1.9% as technology stocks turned in the best performance of all sectors for the week slipping just -0.4%. The three largest stocks in the market, all trillion-dollar plus market values, all actually managed gains as illustrated in the accompanying table.
- On the other end of the spectrum were financials, in particular banks, among the worst performing sector falling -5.2%. The government’s stress test results, discussed above, as well as the renewed fears that the economy may recover slower than desired, weighed on these stocks as illustrated in the below table of the biggest bank stocks.
- Small U.S. stocks were down -3.1% for the week continuing to underperform large stocks with a loss of -16.9% for 2020.
- International stocks weathered this somewhat rough week far better than stocks in the U.S. Developed markets were down -0.9% with Eurozone stocks, one of the three major developed regions, off just -0.5%. Emerging markets overall were actually able to squeak out a small gain of +0.1% helped by gains in both Hong Kong and Taiwan up +0.6% and +1.8% respectively.
- Real estate stocks continued to face a lot of selling pressure, a group seen at risk if we see a significant second wave of COVID-19. These stocks were down -3.1% for the week and are now off -15.3% since their recent June 8th high. Furthermore, their year-to-date loss is among the worst we follow down -24.2%.
- Commodities fell -3.0% hurt by the price of oil. After reaching above $41 per barrel earlier in the week, the price settled at $38.16 on renewed concerns that demand could soften.
- Gold and bonds were the two bright spots in diversified portfolios. Both are considered safe-havens generally attracting investors during periods of uncertainty and market declines. Gold performed the best up +1.5% for the week and now higher by +16.5 in 2020. Bonds inched higher by +0.2% bringing their year-to-date gain to +6.3%. Not all bonds enjoyed gains with riskier corporate and high-yield bonds declining and U.S. government bonds higher.
New home sales for May came in stronger than expected at an annualized rate of 676,000 which was up +16.6% from the prior months number. These number can be subject to significant revisions as we saw for the April number being revised down to 580,000 from an originally reported 623,000. The two areas of the country hardest hit be COVID-19, the Northeast and the West, saw the biggest surges up +45.5% and +29.0% respectively. Helping fuel this strength is record low mortgage rates making homes more affordable for buyers.
Existing home sales also came in better than expected at 3.91 million but this was down from 4.33 million the month before. One reason for the drop in existing home sales while new home sales increased is a difference in the reporting method. New home sales are reported when the contract is signed while existing home sales are counted when sales are closed. Therefore, the May existing home sales numbers really reflect more of what was happening in March and April when those contracts were being signed. Expectations are that these numbers will improve next month.
Weekly initial jobless claims, once an almost ignored report, has become one of the most closely followed since the start of the pandemic. This week’s report showed another drop in claims to 1.48 million but this was higher than economists had expected and suggests improvements in this number are slowing. When including claims made through a temporary federal program the number came in at 2.19 million which was down just fractionally from the week before.
Consumer spending surged in may up +8.2%, a massive rebound from the prior month’s decline of -12.6%, but fell short of economists’ expectations of a gain of +9.9%. This was generally considered a good sign that consumers are both willing and able to spend but spending remains -12% down from February pre-pandemic.
Upcoming Economic Reports
- June Employment Report
- Initial Jobless Claims
- Case-Shiller Home Price Index
- Consumer Confidence Index
- ISM Manufacturing Index
- Motor Vehicle Sales
- Factory Orders
The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. Any specific securities or investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own situation before making any investment decision including whether to retain an investment adviser.
All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market, economic or political conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. This content was created as of the specific date indicated and reflects the author’s views as of that date. Supporting documentation for any claims or statistical information is available upon request.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Any comments about the performance of securities, markets, or indexes and any opinions presented are not to be viewed as indicators of future performance.
Investing involves risk including loss of principal.
Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses, and cannot be invested in directly. For more information on specific indexes please see full disclosure here.
Any charts, tables, forecasts, etc. contained herein are for illustrative purposes only, may be based upon proprietary research, and are developed through analysis of historical public data.
All corporate names shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are NOT recommendations.
International investments involve additional risks, which include differences in financial accounting standards, currency fluctuations, geopolitical risk, foreign taxes and regulations, and the potential for illiquid markets. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.
Fixed income securities are subject to increased loss of principal during periods of rising interest rates. Fixed-income investments are subject to various other risks including changes in credit quality, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, corporate events, tax ramifications and other factors. Lower-rated securities are subject to greater credit risk, default risk, and liquidity risk.